Home Exposition Screenplays Stage Plays Comments Contact Search

 

Site News

     
 
   
2025-02-17 Understanding Musk's Statements and Behavior

Musk's statements indicate a profound lack of understanding of the Constitution of the United States from historical, legal, and practical perspectives. His behavior reflects his goal of remodeling the Federal government along the lines of one or more of his businesses

Alexander Hamilton, one of the chief designers of the U. S. Constitution, and himself a very keen businessman prior to entering politics, understood the differences required in running a business for profit, and governing a people. These differences are alluded to in the Forward of our Constitution and include establishing justice, insuring domestic tranquility, providing for the common defense, promoting the general welfare, and much more.

In addition, the differences between these two men is striking. Hamilton, like Musk, was smart, but he used that intelligence to help found a government based on a constitution written and ratified by the people of the future United States. Musk would form a government without public consent, consistent only with his personal convictions, and without subjecting these to the scrutiny of a public forum. Musk's statement that his actions are "what the people want" has no basis in fact.





2025-02-08 The Actual Cost of Running the Federal Government

Trump and Musk's reasons for reducing the size of the Federal Government are that their combined efforts will eliminate massive waste and fraud, and make the governing process more cost efficient. These are blatant lies. Here I present an in-depth analysis of the actual cost and efficiency of recent operations of the Federal government. These have been implemented by president Joe Biden's appointees, and the civil servants employed under his administration.

The real reason for decimating the infrastructure of the Federal Government is to have a few oligarchs, tech businesses and Heritage Foundation idealogues take control. They want to run the Federal Government unopposed in an authoritarian fashion to serve their own ends, as if it were simply another business venture. These are heartless individuals who would ignore the real needs of the people of this country, and allow the decimation of its environment, and that of the world's, in the process. They would abrogate our U.S. Constitution and ignore any laws legislated under that constitution by our elected representatives. They will attempt to destroy other individuals or groups who stand in their way, even if their opponents are sovereign nations.

QUESTION: Before you read this analysis (which you can fact check), answer this question: What percentage of Federal income from tax revenues is spent as "overhead costs"? 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, . . . or more?

ANSWER: Note: Sorry, I can't explain the answer with an exclamatory remark like "Yee gods!!!" followed by several emojis, or even with a 140 character response. If you guess wrong, please don't attempt to justify your answer using some asinine argument that won't hold up under scrutiny.

And the following is true for most complex issues where problems arise: there are no simple answers. You must do the analysis and the math. Unless, of course, you prefer to believe what you hear and see on FOX NEWS entertainment media, or what your "friends" tell you.
Read More




2025-02-06 Guess Who Is Pulling the Strings



2025-02-03 Implementing the New World Order

The political problems that we are experiencing now on a daily basis have their root cause in the world of work. Many problems have arisen that have made this environment difficult for a large number of people seeking financial security. At their wits end, they are ready and willing to accept a simple promise of solutions, and also accept specious arguments about who is to blame for their predicament.

To solve these problems and to douse the current political firestorm, we really need to think outside the sandboxes in which the Democrats and Republicans are willing to play. To do this we must implement a new world order both strategically and tactically. The problems arising in the world of work are made even more difficult because they arise in a global and not simply a national context.
Read More




2025-01-29 Understanding and Addressng a New World Order

To solve a problem you must understand the nature of the system in which it arises. The source of our current political crisis is not simply the mishandling of government by Trump and his supporters. Those misguided attempts to rectify perceived economic and social problems are merely the symptoms of a much more complex interplay of variables. This interplay amounts to the series of technological changes that we are currently experiencing on a worldwide scale.
Read More

2025-01-23 Just say "No" To Trump

Trump is playing dictator just like he said he would. This is no time to roll over and play dead. It's a time to stand up for the democracy we are supposed to be and say "No" to the nonsense flowing from his mouth and pen, and overcome the reluctance of your representatives in government to do anything to stop this fascist behavior.
Read More

2025-01-08 Trunp is a Walking Shitstorm

He is not yet president of the United States and he is threatening to use the U.S. military to take the Panama Canal from Panama, Greenland from Denmark, and then simply annex Canada and make it the 51st state. In addition he wants to rename The Gulf of Mexico, "The Gulf of America". What's next? "The American Ocean".
Read More

2022-03-29 The Bully in the Schoolyard

"BULLY"
Definition from Merriam Webster Unabridged Dictionary:

"A blustering fellow more insolent than courageous : one given to hectoring, browbeating and threatening: especially : One habitually threatening, harsh, or cruel [beyond words] to others weaker or smaller than himself."

There is no doubt that Putin and Putin's Russia is a bully. The question is: What are we going to do about it?
Read More


   
2022-03-07

Look Over the Edge

Putin's plan was to overrun Ukraine with superior numbers and military hardware in just a few days. This included taking Kyiv, eradicating Zelenskyy , eliminating the democratically elected government, and intimidating the rest of the country by immediately placing Russian troops in all the major cities in Ukraine. With those troops in place. . .
Read More


   
2022-03-06

With All Due Respect to Boris Johnson

Nothing short of war is going to have any significant impact on Putin's empire building decisions. Furthermore the majority of the Russian populace believe in and support Putin; they are not about to  overthrow him for what he is doing in Ukraine.

 

Russia, in spite of any sanctions levied on it, has the  energy, agricultural, mineral and industrial resources  to carry on quite independently. Moreover. . .
Read More


   
2022-03-03 We Will Not Get Into a Shooting War With Russia



   
2022-03-01

GEOPOLITICS 101

We are in a race with Russia and China for whose form of government will dominate the world for generations to come.

Both Putin an Xi represent a top down form of government where people are ruled by dictators. We have been working for years to develop a bottom up form of government where rules for behavior are determined by the people themselves.

Today we face a direct challenge to our way of life and our influence on the other countries of the world by Putin's invasion of Ukraine. Today, 01 March 2022, the president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, made an appeal to the United States for direct military intervention: troops not simply munitions.

In his own words, broadcast on CNN, he said that ...
Read More


 

 

2022-03-01

UNITI STAMUS, DIVISI CADIMUS

   
2022-02-25

Putin as Hitler Incarnate



   
2022-02-24

The Naysayers

"This is Putin's War. But America and NATO Aren't Innocent Bystanders"

—Thomas L Friedman, New York Times opinion article, 21 February 2022

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/21/opinion/putin-ukraine-nato.html

 

I generally like Friedman's political analyses, but this time his opinion is so far out in right field that he is sitting in the stands. However, he is not the only one who is blaming  the U.S. and NATO for helping to create a world order that "forced" Putin into invading Ukraine. The referenced article is Friedman's explanation of how he arrived at this conclusion, but a careful interpretation of the facts, rather than acceptance of opinions from extant policy wonks at work in the 90s, tell a much different story. And strangely enough all the relevant facts appear in this same article.

 

Friedman's argument goes something like this...

Read More